Role Of Gender Difference In Helping Behaviour †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Role Of Gender Difference In Helping Behaviour. Answer: Introduction: Gender difference has its effects on different spheres of social life. Helping or prosocial behavior is one of the important phenomena of modern human society. Difference in sex and gender are the key factors that affect situations that require altruistic behavior (Koon, 2013). Different studies on how men and women act in situations when help to a stranger required showed different and often contradictory results. Research objective: To find out if there is any substantial changes in behavior pattern due to gender difference. To find out if people are aware of their gender bias. To find out when people are more willing to help, in case people of the same sex are at stake or people of the opposite sex, and how does it vary across genders. Research questions: Is there any kind of substantial change observed in behavioral pattern of the people, due to gender difference? How does helping behavior change if people of the same sex are at stake, and if people of opposite sex are at stake? What roles gender difference play in influencing the helping behavior of an individual? Literature review: History of bystander effect: There are several witnesses to a mishap but nobody came forward to help (Koon, 2013). Diffusion of responsibility: Every other person is thinking that the other person has the responsibility to take upon his or her own shoulder and simply shirk off the social responsibility to help the person at stake (Feng et al., 2016). Relationship between gender and helping behavior: Some studies have shown that there is no significant difference between men and women in case they are required to help the other person. There is also gender role model. According to that, male are willing to help when there is bravery needed, or when chivalry is required (Hupp-Wilds, 2014). Whereas, women engage in more emotional help, and help that requires understanding of more subtle psychological complications (Eagly, 2013). Findings: Different social experiments in regulated artificial setting will help get the desired results. Gender bias is as much social as it is cultural. Different cultures have their own understandings of gender bias. A study that addresses the degree of gender awareness among a social group and how that is affecting their overall prosocial behavior can also shed light upon other social aspects of their individual as well as community lifestyle. Research methodology: Statistical analysis of different surveys under modified artificial setting, such as mentioned above, or any other imagined situations, can give desired results concerning the proposed research objectives. Several experimental economic games like Dictator game, Public Good Game, Ultimatum Game can be modified and if conducted properly, can give useful results (Espinosa Kov?k, 2015). Also, the Qualitative Method of data collection can be used. The primary data can also be collected by organizing face to face interview with the respondents- decide who should be your respondents, what is the sample size, and how would you select them. Conclusion: Addressing issues of gender bias in situations requiring prosocial behavior can facilitate derivation of further social implications like, the common degree of gender awareness. How the awareness of gender bias can have its effect on prosocial behavior. Recommendations: The study should qualitatively evaluate the gender awareness. It should also focus on how different cultural factors will affect gender bias and further affect the helping behaviors in different social situations where people of opposite sex are involved. References: Conrads, J., Irlenbusch, B., Rilke, R. M., Walkowitz, G. (2013). Lying and team incentives.Journal of Economic Psychology,34, 1-7. Eagly, A. H. (2013).Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Psychology Press. Espinosa, M. P., Kov?k, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior and gender.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,9, 88. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00088 Feng, C., Deshpande, G., Liu, C., Gu, R., Luo, Y. J., Krueger, F. (2016). Diffusion of responsibility attenuates altruistic punishment: a functional magnetic resonance imaging effective connectivity study.Human brain mapping,37(2), 663-677. Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T. (2013). The positive bystander effect: Passive bystanders increase helping in situations with high expected negative consequences for the helper.The Journal of social psychology,153(1), 1-5. Hupp-Wilds, B. (2014). Gender Roles and Helping Behavior. Columbus: The Ohio State University. Koon, J. (2013). Masculinity and bystander helping behavior: A study of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and bystander interventions. America: University of Iowa.